Monthly Archives: August 2013

Fortune-telling with 54 Devils

Playing Cards have been used for Fortune-telling longer than Tarot Cards

Over the weekend I came into posession of the book, “54 Devils:  The Art and Folklore of Fortune-telling with Playing Cards” by Cory Thomas Hutcheson of New World Witchery. You can purchase this lovely little book at a low price here.

54 Devils lays out Cory’s personal methods of divination using the cards of a standard poker deck. What sort of mystical, magical significance do playing cards have? Doesn’t Tarot work good enough? You might ask. Well, it seems that playing cards are a bit older than Tarot, giving them a longer time to be used in divination. Evidence shows that Tarot was used as a game, not for fortune-telling and definitely not ancient. Furthermore, the majority of divination systems share counterparts in the gambling and gaming world. Cards, dice, coins, and similar things all find their way into fortune-telling at some point. Both gambling and fortune-telling are overseen by random chance, or as she is called sometimes “Lady Luck.”

I recommend Cory’s book for anyone who wants to find the mystical in the mundanity of playing cards. It is a concise manual laying out the symbolism for Red and Black, Aces, the numbers, the face cards, the Joker, and of course, the four suits. While I realized that Spades, Clubs, Hearts and Diamonds are similar to Swords, Wands, Cups and Coins, the meanings attributed to them are slightly different.

My favorite part of the book was the collection of folk-wisdom in the appendix. Cory presents a story of a Soldier explaining the Biblical symbolism in a deck of cards, as well as how it may serve useful as an Almanac. Also included are two incantations first recorded by Charles Leland of “Aradia” fame. An old fortune-telling game played at parties comes next- it’s instructunes are presented as a rhyme, and meanings are different for men and women. Cory also includes card meanings recorded in a 1920’s book of Kentucky Superstitions, as well as a short fiction written by himself about the famous Aunt Carolina Dye giving a card reading in order to provide inspiration to the would-be-reader.

I’ve been wanting to read playing cards for a very long time. It’s easier to carry a playing deck than a Tarot deck. Plus, if I find myself in someone’s home or business and want to perform a reading, I will more likely be able to find a deck of playing cards. The best part of all is preparing to do a reading for someone who expects magic and divination to be a grand affair and pulling out a simple playing card deck. When their skepticism sinks in due to the seemingly ordinary cards, I invoke the 54 Devils and give them a “spooky accurate reading.”


If you want a free reading, to help my get some pratice in while I learn the playing cards, please contact me. I will not be doing this for very long, maybe just the next couple of weeks. I would also appreciate some feed back as concerns the manifestation of the prediction.

Email me at:


Jake Stratton-Kent’s Manifesto against Masonic-style Magic

Over at Aaron Leitch’s blog Ananael (The Secrets of Wisdom), he posted an open letter from collegue Jake Stratton-Kent, author of the eye-opening Geosophia. Jake posted this letter on Aaron’s Solomonic Yahoo Group, which caused something of a stir. Aaron and Jake are friends, which made for some interesting debate. I’m not going to post Aaron’s responses since you can read them on his blog. I just thought that Jake’s open letter was, for all intents and purposes, correct. I do not believe in an eradication of the Golden Dawn and other Masonic-style lodge workings, nor do I believe that there shouldn’t be secretive societies- it is beneficial for certain groups to operate under a degree of anonymity. What Jake rails against are the mistakes perpetuated by the magical groups that came out of the late 1800’s, the fallible concept of “secret knowledge”, as well as mentioning his distaste for the “darker than thou” Lovecraft-Satanic-Qlipothic stream in  certain branches of Occultism.

I am posting Jake’s manifesto because 1) I agree with his point of view, and 2) Jake is an academic magician, like me, who has taken the study of magic to be his vocation, not just his spiritual pursuit or  hobby, and 3) before I even came across Jake’s work about the origin of Goetia in Ancient Greek shamanism, I myself was beginning to realize these mysteries, which makes me feel that there is a current flowing through modern Occultism wherein many scholars and practitioners are moving in a certain direction. I believe that direction is being pointed out by Jake Stratton-Kent throughout all his work.

“Goetia versus secrecy, Masonry & bogus history

opening remarks

This is close to an outline manifesto, relevant to the POV of my writings and distilled from over 4 decades of involvement in magic, public and private. I’m sure many will reject it out of hand, or mount a defence of aspects of occultism it attacks – but nothing said here is unconsidered; while the unquestioning retention of what it opposes desperately requires critique. Some of it explains why I’m a controversial figure, who many traditionalists find too radical, and ‘post moderns’ consider old fashioned. These easy dismissals are neat ways of avoiding important issues, when in fact the similarities between the extremes are more extensive than the differences, which is part of the problem, as I outline below.

*Goetia versus secrecy, Masonry and bogus history in modern occultism*

The historical links between goetia and shamanism are very strong. If you are familiar with the ‘Greek shaman’ thesis of Burkert et al, ‘goes’ was originally the Greek for shaman, especially as psychopomp. Funnily enough the same word, in its later devalued sense could also mean ‘witch’. Properly understood goetia is – essentially – the one authentic and continuous link the modern Western tradition has with the past, and that includes modern witchcraft (as I believe Hutton pointed out, and he is certainly right historically speaking).

There are various reasons I find the ‘Masonic’ model a dead loss in the many, many areas of modern magic where it applies. I see two reasons for Masonry in magic, one good enough, the other p*** poor. The good enough one was as a cover for free thinkers in an age when – for example – non-attendance at Anglican church was an imprisonable offense in England. That time is over. The other I will come to later.

The whole Secret Society model is not only unhelpful, but actively counter-productive. It is the principle reason why so much energy is expended fighting tiny little wars between factions (between witch groups, between rival Golden Dawns, between thelemic groups etc etc). Energy that could be better spent elsewhere – like incorporating the real advances in recovering our tradition made possible by *non-secretive* sources like academia. Indeed, one reason parts of the grimoire community are advancing faster than any other area nowadays is that it doesn’t automatically include this model! Which, whether in Magical Orders or Witchcraft leads to infighting, stagnation and parochialism. I also have no more time for ‘invented history’, which the entire occult world seems to rely on to an alarming extent. But lets start with secrecy.

Nothing I’ve heard from witch groups or magical orders in the last forty plus years has led me to feel they possess *any* privileged information – let alone insights – regarding goetia. Its been more of the same for decades, indeed since the C19th it has hardly moved at all – at least, not among occultists.

From my perspective, what I’ve learned about goetia in the occult world as manifest since the C19th is very unimpressive. Even if someone is jealously guarding material from deeper into the C18th/C19th it still lacks a lot of context, info and insights now available from modern scholarship, the papyri etc. Things have stood still for so long that modern research has got further along without them, and they don’t want to catch up! Where magic is going is not like where it has been since early modern times, but very few have caught on to that.

Which brings me to the Bertiaux/Grant end of the spectrum, what I call ‘dark fluff’, a major epidemic in recent modern occultism. There are so many ‘darker than thou’ types out there playing silly games with the Qliphoth, Necronomicon, Atlantean initiations and such. The grasp of the roots of magic in this ‘niche’ is even more bogus than the ‘occult establishment’ of the C19th and its offshoots. Indeed, they are much more similar to that establishment than they imagine. Spookying up the Golden Dawn, Crowley and modern witchcraft with a dash of Lovecraft and Qliphoth etc is no more informed about the real roots of Western magic in goetia. Its just more of the same in all but the most superficial details.

Which brings me to the other aspect of ‘why we used masonry’. It was as a *substitute* for elements of the magical tradition we’d either lost, or felt uncomfortable with in a more orthodox religious environment than currently exists. Virtually every western school has relied on Masonry to fill in the gaps for so long that they are no longer very interested in recovering what it was substituting for. There is so much Masonic bathwater that has to go to make room for real babies in the bath, and change frightens people. Hence bogus history and Masonry predominate, even though there is much better information and different structures available.

The *real* roots of what has been called ‘black magic’ by later philosophies and religions, is in fact an incredibly rich tradition distinct from them, *not defined by opposition to them*, or even reliant on similar terms (qabalistic or neoplatonist).

In short, through clinging to bogus history and the secret society model, we are selling ourselves very short indeed as Western magicians.